Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- livebox:universalrf [2013/12/18 20:55] – [HomeEasy (advanced)] mark_baldwin
+++ livebox:universalrf [2014/06/08 09:20] (current) – [HomeEasy (advanced)] minerva9
@@ Line 184: / Line 184: @@
 Devices tested include the HE109 and the HE302. The HE302 sockets are interesting in that they can be trained to respond to both the BBSB and the HE Advanced protocol. However, the HE109 twin sockets will only respond to this 'advanced' version of the protocol.
-Re the message protocol itself. This always starts with a latch signal of 275uS hi and 2675uS low. Then a unique 'group code' which is 26bits long (each bit being to 'wire bits'). The last 4 bits are the device code ... these can be altered to address upto 16 devices on the given group code.
+Re the message protocol itself. This always starts with a latch signal of 275uS hi and 2675uS low. Then a unique 'group code' which is 26bits long (each bit being two 'wire bits'). The last 4 bits are the device code ... these can be altered to address upto 16 devices on the given group code.
@@ Line 219: / Line 219: @@
 \\
 Non-UK, European users might like to know that this [[http://www.nexa.se/PB3Ny3packsjalvlarande.htm|Nexa]] RF socket has been successfully tested with the HAH.
+HAH user kema01 supplied these as working with a HE109
+off=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A659999999A40
+ on=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A65999A599A40
+off=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A65999999A580
+ on=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A65999A59A580
+off=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A65999999A640
+ on=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A65999A59A640
+off=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A6599999A5980
+ on=010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C000000000A012710421999999999A65999A6599A65999A5A5980
 \\
 \\
@@ Line 292: / Line 306: @@
 While experimenting with RF helper I have found that 'odd' addresses always have the same dim suffix and 'even' addresses have another common set.
-Odd addresses (bit 0 set to 1)
+Odd addresses (bit 0 set to 1) Even address (bit 0 set to 0)
-^ Suffix ^ Level ^
+^ Odd Suffix ^ Even Suffix ^ Level ^
-| 599A40| DIM 1 |
+| 599A40| 999A40| DIM 1 |
-| 59A580| DIM 2 |
+| 59A580| 99A580| DIM 2 |
-| 59A640| DIM 3 |
+| 59A640| 99A640| DIM 3 |
-| 5A5980| DIM 4 |
+| 5A5980| 9A5980| DIM 4 |
-| 5A5A40| DIM 5 |
+| 5A5A40| 9A5A40| DIM 5 |
-| 5A6580| DIM 6 |
+| 5A6580| 9A6580| DIM 6 |
-| 5A6640| DIM 7 |
+| 5A6640| 9A6640| DIM 7 |
-| 659980| DIM 8 |
+| 659980| A59980| DIM 8 |
-| 659A40| DIM 9 |
+| 659A40| A59A40| DIM 9 |
-| 65A580| DIM 10 |
+| 65A580| A5A580| DIM 10 |
-| 65A640| DIM 11 |
+| 65A640| A5A640| DIM 11 |
-| 665980| DIM 12 |
+| 665980| A65980| DIM 12 |
-| 665A40| DIM 13 |
+| 665A40| A65A40| DIM 13 |
-| 666580| DIM 14 |
+| 666580| A66580| DIM 14 |
-| 666640| DIM 15 |
+| 666640| A66640| DIM 15 |
-Even addresses (bit 0 set to 0)
-^ Suffix ^ Level ^
-| 999A40| DIM 1 |
-| 99A580| DIM 2 |
-| 99A640| DIM 3 |
-| 9A5980| DIM 4 |
-| 9A5A40| DIM 5 |
-| 9A6580| DIM 6 |
-| 9A6640| DIM 7 |
-| A59980| DIM 8 |
-| A59A40| DIM 9 |
-| A5A580| DIM 10 |
-| A5A640| DIM 11 |
-| A65980| DIM 12 |
-| A65A40| DIM 13 |
-| A66580| DIM 14 |
-| A66640| DIM 15 |
 Some example codes;
@@ Line 372: / Line 367: @@
 | 010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C00FA00000C0127104A1999999A5999A5A5A599A659A59965A5A66580| DIM 14 |
 | 010200FA09C400FA00FA00FA044C00FA00000C0127104A1999999A5999A5A5A599A659A59965A5A66640| DIM 15 |
-While experimenting I have found that 'odd' addresses always have the same dim suffix and 'even' addresses have another common set.